The gap in high school and college reading and writing

This discrepancy points to a major disconnect between college readiness as defined in terms of course completion, credit hours, and standard assessment scores, and college readiness as defined in terms of what colleges and universities expect from entering students.

Improving College Readiness Through Coherent State Policy Causes of the Readiness Gap The college readiness gap reflects the disparity between the skills and knowledge that students gain in high school versus the skills and knowledge that colleges and universities expect.

Courses and seat time do not guarantee skills and knowledge The standards movement in P—12 schools argued against seat time as an indicator of satisfactory high school completion. Unless those assessments reflect the specific readiness skills in reading, writing, and math that have been adopted across P—16 in each state, there is no assurance that helping students score well on those assessments will help them become college ready.

Additionally, state high school accountability systems need to emphasize the importance of increasing the percentage of students who are college ready. There will be a gap between what high schools teach and what colleges expect as long as the two sectors do not develop expectations jointly.

Hopefully, the development of common state college readiness standards in reading, writing, and math will provide a basis that highlights and emphasizes these skill-based standards.

The college-prep-college readiness gap It is not so well known that many high school students who fulfill all the college-preparatory requirements likewise arrive at state colleges and universities unprepared. Colleges are not accountable for degree completion Most state accountability and finance systems do not monitor or incentivize college completion.

Because of this discrepancy between the goals of state policy and the limitations of that policy in practice, the college-prep-college readiness gap is perhaps a more important and vexing dimension of the problem than is the high school diploma-college readiness gap.

In order to understand the causes of this gap, it is important first to distinguish two dimensions of it: The flaw in this logic is perhaps best illustrated by contrasting the typical 12th grade English curriculum with the typical entry-level college English class.

Many states have established college-prep coursework as the default curriculum and are eager to direct more students to follow it.

Seat time, the argument went, does not indicate what a student knows and is able to do. They are set at this level due to pressures on states and schools to minimize the numbers of students who do not receive a diploma.

Even a recognized college-preparatory curriculum does not ensure the development of the critical thinking skills associated with reading, writing, and math that are necessary for college-level learning.

Greater emphasis by states on accountability of higher education for completion rates would encourage colleges to join public schools in systemic and comprehensive efforts to articulate, monitor, and improve college readiness skills in reading, writing, and mathematics.

In fact, there are powerful voices in many states that assert that a high school diploma need not indicate college readiness. No Child Left Behind has reinforced this tendency, as the law holds states accountable for high school graduation rates irrespective of proficiency levels represented by the diploma.

The flawed assumption has been that if students take the right courses and earn the right grades they will be ready for college. Additionally, postsecondary placement tests may bear little connection to the high school curriculum or to high school assessments.

The answers to this question are outlined below, and they collectively point to the need for a more fundamental and comprehensive state policy to improve college readiness.

E-Mail this link to a friend. Most states that have high school exit exams or other "high-stakes" tests readily acknowledge that the exams measure proficiency at the 8th to 10th grade levels.

Generic national assessments of college readiness are not connected tightly enough to the state curriculum.

Approximately half of the students entering the less-selective four-year institutions are not ready for college. State leaders are familiar with this high school diploma-college readiness gap. The emphasis has been on courses taken and knowledge gained, which is necessary and appropriate.

It is readily apparent why a 10th grade equivalency is not likely to prepare students for college, but why is it that a college-prep curriculum leaves so many students without the learning skills needed for college-level study? While many states have made progress in getting more students to take the high school courses necessary for college readiness and have strengthened the content standards in these courses, only a few have specified an explicit set of performance skills in reading, writing, and math that signify college readiness.

P—12 and postsecondary expectations are disconnected The overarching answer as to why a college-prep curriculum leaves so many students unprepared is that P—12 schools and postsecondary education typically set college readiness expectations independently of one another.

Traditional readiness assessments do not measure college readiness College-bound students enrolled in a college-prep curriculum are advised or required to take standardized assessments like the ACT, PSAT, and SAT to gauge their readiness for college. But unless those assessments reflect the specific readiness skills in reading, writing, and math that have been adopted across school and postsecondary systems, there is no assurance that helping students score well on those assessments will help them become college ready.

Despite competing pressures to ensure that all high school graduates are college ready, states have found it politically difficult to set high school exit exams at higher levels.

Too often, accountability applies only to students meeting minimum standards. Despite the fact that the college-prep curriculum does not ensure college readiness, many state leaders see the college-prep route as the solution to the readiness gap.

And they are skills that college placement or readiness tests expose as insufficiently mastered by most entering students. Most standardized assessments are not very useful for helping teachers diagnose which college-ready skills students may be lacking, so that they can tailor the curriculum or their teaching methods accordingly.

Schools and teachers are not accountable for teaching to college readiness standards In the absence of college readiness standards, teachers have no reliable guides to focus their teaching directly on helping students attain college readiness. Yet these students, for the most part, have completed a college-prep curriculum and have attained the required combination of grade point average and college admission test scores-in addition to earning a high school diploma and passing an exit exam.

The placement tests administered by colleges are their readiness standards, but they vary substantially across institutions even within a state or a postsecondary systemboth in the tests and cut-off scores used.

The high school diploma-college readiness gap Earning a high school diploma does not mean that graduates are ready for college.

States should hold high schools accountable for increasing the percentages of their graduates who enroll in college prepared to take college courses.

It is no surprise, then, that many students who earn a high school diploma and pass the exit exams are far from being college ready. However, equal emphasis must be placed on integrating the development of higher level learning skills in the curriculum, specifically in reading, writing, and math.Students who lack basic skills, such as math or reading, may have to take remedial courses that bridge the gap from high school to college-level math.

Without strong math, reading and writing skills, students struggle to grow through continually challenging classes that require calculations, text readings and paper assignments. Postsecondary Expectations and High School Practice: Aligning Postsecondary Expectations and High School Practice: The Gap Defined teachers in English/writing, reading (including English language arts and social.

From High School to College: Developing Writing Skills in the Disciplines. VIRGINIA CRANK.

first-year students develop college-level writing skills. The gap between high school and college writing can complicate interactions between students, who often believe seem overwhelmed by and unprepared for the writing and reading tasks.

In college, these students have to repeat their high school reading, writing, and math courses before taking college-level classes. This is expensive, both for the students and for taxpayers, who are paying for this public education twice. The college readiness gap reflects the disparity between the skills and knowledge that students gain in high school versus the skills and knowledge that colleges and universities expect.

Closing the Gap between High School and College. The Gap between High School and College: Challenges. 5 Historically, the traditional student progressed through the education system in a linear fashion with one entry and exit.

However, today’s education system reading, writing and arithmetic. Still, a.

Download
The gap in high school and college reading and writing
Rated 4/5 based on 55 review